WHO Aims to Assign a Team to Set Rules for Gene-Editing Technologies


Everything was going on-track in the world of gene-editing. Scientists tested the technology on animals and embryos in the laboratory. However, all things went wrong after the Chinese scientist claimed of editing genes. He claimed to have developed two genetically modified human embryos, who came successfully into this world. Additionally, he used CRISPR-Cas9 editing technology to alter genes responsible for HIV. The experiment is very disturbing and reckless. Eric Juengst, director of the Center for Bioethics at the University of North Carolina, says the news raised the temperature. Now the pressure is more, and everyone is trying to complete that research.

Despite, the scientific community has massively denounced He Jiankui for his work. Fundamental analysis is that CRISPR’s effects are not yet verified. Additionally, the researchers do not know the technique in-depth till date. According to a report from The Wall Street Journal, the unplanned outcomes CRISPR gene editing has had on animals. Currently, the biotechnology is a developing one, and its overall development is not over. However, the technique can treat various genetic disorders. Besides, He’s research has sparked the worry that current rules are not enough. Thus, the WHO announced that it would appoint a team of experts to look after ethical and safety issues. The group will also set rules and regulations accordingly.

Tarik Jasarevic, a WHO representative, said the team is being set right now. He also said that the use of such technologies must be controlled. Besides, genetically editing babies can be harmful to society. It may raise some new bioethical problems. Additionally, there is a great danger in developing babies in the laboratory. In future, a time may come that people go to a gene-boutique to get their designer babies. This gives rise to other medical issues. Consequently, He’s research would also increase the threat of gene-editing enhancements. At the end He’s research has emerged some complicated questions about the gene-editing analyses. But just because we can do, not at all mean that we should do anything.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *